列表

详情


When Microsoft bought task management app Wunderlist and mobile calendar Sunrise in 2015, it picked up two newcomers that were attracting considerable buzz in Silicon Valley. Microsoft’s own Office dominates the market for “productivity” software, but the start-ups represented a new wave of technology designed from the ground up for the smart phone world.
Both apps, however, were later scrapped, after Microsoft said it had used their best features in its own products. Their teams of engineers stayed on, making them two of the many “acquit-hires”that the biggest companies have used to feed their insatiable hunger for tech talent.
To Microsoft’s critics, the fates of Wunderlist and Sunrise are examples of a remorseless drive by Big Tech to chew up any innovative companies that lie in their.path. “They bought the seedlings and closed them down,” complained Paul Arnold, a partner at San Francisco-based Switch Ventures, putting paid to businesses that might one day turn into competitors. Microsoft declined to comment.
Like other start-up investors, Mr Arnold’ s own business often depends on selling start-ups to larger tech companies, though he admits to mixed feelings about the result:“I think these things are good for me, if I put my selfish hat on. But are they good for the American economy? I don’t know.”
The US Federal Trade Commission says it wants to find the answer to that question. This week, it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information about their many small acquisitions over the past decade. Although only a research project at this stage, the request has raised the prospect of regulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have been beyond their reach.
Given their combined market value of more than $5.5tn, rifling through such small deals—many of them much less prominent than Wunderlist and Sunrise—might seem beside the point. Between them, the five companies (Apple, Microsoft, Google,Amazon and Facebook) have spent an average of only $3.4bn a year on sub-$1bn acquisitions over the past five years—a drop in the ocean compared with their massive financial reserves, and the more than $130bn of venture capital that was invested in the US last year.
However, critics say that the big companies use such deals to buy their most threatening potential competitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum, in some cases as part of a “buy and kill”. tactic to simply close them down.
1.What is true about Wunderlist and sunrise after their acquisitions(  ).
2. Microsoft’s critics believe that the big tech companies tend to (  ) . 
3.PaulArnold is concerned that small acquisitions might( ).
4.The US Federal Trade Commission intend to( ).
5.For the five biggest tech companies, their small acquisition have( ).

第 1 问

A. Their market values declined

B. Their tech features improved

C. Their engineers were retained

D. Their products were re-priced

第 2 问

A. ignore public opinions

B. treat new tech talent unfairly

C. exaggerate their product quality

D. eliminate their potential competitors

第 3 问

A. harm the national economy

B. worsen market competition

C. discourage start-up investors

D. weaken big tech companies

第 4 问

A. examine small acquisitions

B. limit Big Tech' s expansion

C. supervise start-ups' operations

D. encourage research collaboration

第 5 问

A. brought little financial pressure

B. raised few management challenges

C. set an example for future deals

D. generated considerable profits

参考答案: C D A A A

详细解析:

【选项释义】
1. What is true about Wunderlist and Sunrise after their acquisitions? Wunderlist和Sunrise收购后的真实情况是什么?
A. Their market values declined. A. 他们的市场价值下降了。
B. Their tech features improved. B. 他们的技术特点得到了改进。
C. Their engineers were retained. C. 他们的工程师被保留了下来。
D. Their products were re-priced. D. 他们的产品被重新定价了。
【答案】C
【考查点】事实细节题。
【解题思路】根据题干定位到第二段第二句“他们的工程师团队留下了(teams of engineers stayed on)……”,因此选项C符合原文。
【干扰项排除】
A、B、D选项原文没有提及,属于无中生有。

【选项释义】
2. Microsoft’s critics believe that the big tech companies tend to _____. 微软的批评者认为,大型科技公司倾向于_____。
A. ignore public opinions A. 无视公众意见
B. treat new tech talent unfairly B. 不公平地对待新科技人才
C. exaggerate their product quality C. 夸大产品质量
D. eliminate their potential competitors D. 消除潜在的竞争对手
【答案】D
【考查点】事实细节题。
【解题思路】根据题干定位到原文第三段第一句“在微软的批评者看来,Wunderlist和Sunrise的命运表明,大型科技公司无情地想要摧毁任何挡在它们道路上的创新公司(chew up any innovative companies that lie in their path)”,选项D符合原文。
【干扰项排除】
A、B、C选项原文没有提及,属于无中生有。

【选项释义】
3. Paul Arnold is concerned that small acquisitions might _____. 保罗•阿诺德担心,小型收购可能会_____。
A. harm the national economy A. 危害国民经济
B. worsen market competition B. 加剧市场竞争
C. discourage start-up investors C. 阻碍初创企业投资者
D. weaken big tech companies D. 削弱大型科技公司
【答案】A
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】根据题干定位到第四段“和其他初创企业投资者一样,阿诺德自己的业务也常常依赖于把初创企业卖给更大的科技公司,不过他承认,对这样的结果他也有复杂的感觉(mixed feelings):‘如果我自私自利的话,我觉得这些对我有好处。但它们对美国经济有好处吗?(are they good for the American economy)我不知道’”,由此可知,他担心小型收购可能危害国家经济,选项A符合原文。
【干扰项排除】
B、C、D选项原文没有提及,属于无中生有。

【选项释义】
4. The US Federal Trade Commission intend to _____. 美国联邦贸易委员会打算_____。
A. examine small acquisitions A. 检查小规模收购
B. limit Big Tech’s expansion B. 限制大型科技公司的扩张
C. supervise start-ups’ operations C. 监督公司的运营
D. encourage research collaboration D. 鼓励科研合作
【答案】A
【考查点】事实细节题。
【解题思路】根据题干定位到原文第五段前两句“美国联邦贸易委员会(The US Federal Trade Commission)表示希望找到这个问题的答案。本周,该机构向美国市值最高的5家科技公司询问了(asked)它们在过去10年进行的许多小规模收购(many small acquisitions)的相关信息(information)”,由此可知A选项符合。
【干扰项排除】
B、C、D选项原文没有提及,属于无中生有。

【选项释义】
5. For the five biggest tech companies, their small acquisition have _____. 对于五家最大的科技公司来说,他们的小规模收购_____。
A. brought little financial pressure A. 几乎没有带来经济压力
B. raised few management challenges B. 很少提出管理上的挑战
C. set an example for future deals C. 为未来的交易树立了榜样
D. generated considerable profits D. 产生了可观的利润
【答案】A
【考查点】推理判断题。
【解题思路】根据题干定位到原文第六段第二句“在过去五年中,这五家最大的科技公司平均每年只花费34亿美元用于不到10亿美元的收购(acquisitions),与它们庞大的财务储备(massive financial reserves),以及去年在美国投资的超过1300亿美元的风险资本相比,这只是沧海一粟(a drop in the ocean)”,由此说明对于五家最大的科技公司来说,他们的小规模收购带来的财务压力很小。选项A符合原文。
【干扰项排除】
B、C、D选项原文没有提及,属于无中生有。

上一题